(Formerly "Dealing with Creationism in Astronomy")

- A Changing Speed of Light?
*(Last Modified: November 24, 2009)* - New Redshift Interpretation
*(Last Modified: November 24, 2009)* - Polonium Halos
*(Last Modified: November 24, 2009)* - Accelerated Radioactive Decay?
*(Last Modified: November 24, 2009)* - Solar Claims
*(Last Modified: November 24, 2009)* - A Shortage of Supernova Remnants?
*(Last Modified: November 24, 2009)* - A Decaying Magnetic Field of the Earth
*(Last Modified: November 24, 2009)* - Redshift Quantization
*(Last Modified: March 18, 2012)* - "Relativistic" Creationist Cosmology
*(Last Modified: March 18, 2012)* - Anomaly Science
*(Last Modified: November 24, 2009)* - Development Notes
*(Last Modified: November 24, 2009)*

- History & Technology
*(Last Modified: March 18, 2012)* - Philosophy & Religion
*(Last Modified: November 24, 2009)* - Classroom Resources
*(Last Modified: November 24, 2009)* - Presentation Slides
*(Last Modified: November 24, 2009)*

Site Contents

© 2001-2012, W.T. Bridgman

Send comments, questions, and other inquiries to

This site is also listed at comPADRE and AstronomyCenter.org.

CSS developed with the assistance of CSScreator

Scientific models establish their validity by working over a wide range of conditions. A model that generates only a few usable values is generally regarded as useless. Here is a simple example of model testing using a model actually advocated by creation scientists! (Index to Creationist Claims: CB620) This model has the advantage that any high-school graduate should have the mathematical skills necessary to do it. This problem is simple enough to do in a spreadsheet program.

Consider this simple creationist global population model. P0 is the starting population at the time, t0. The population grows at a constant fractional growth rate, r, defined as the fractional growth per unit time. The population, P, at some later time, t, is then given by

P = P0 (1 + r)^{(t - t0)}

Note that this is the same equation used in calculating earnings in interest-earning bank accounts, where P and P0 are replaced by dollar amounts.

Start in the year of the (claimed) Global Flood (2349 B.C.), t0=-2349. Assign a starting population of eight people, so P0 = 8. Assign a growth rate of 0.5%, so r=0.005. With these parameters and the simple population growth model we get a good match for the t = 2008 global population of about P = 6 billion. (I actually get a better match with 0.47% growth rate but that's a detail).

With only two data points, this equation is guaranteed a solution that matches at two points. From a
scientific perspective, the important question in testing a model is if it
works for times *between* these two points (interpolation).

Years are from the Biblical Timeline available at Creation Ministeries International (CMI), formerly associated with Answers in Genesis.:

- What was the global population at the time of the "Sojourn of Israel" (1921BC)
- What was the global population at the time of the Exodus (1491 B.C.). Does this include the deaths of the first born of Egypt?
- What fraction of the global population did Sampson kill with the jawbone of an ass (Judges 15)? The Biblical timeline from CMI places this between 1491 B.C. & 1012 B.C. Use a better value if you have one.
- What was the global population at the time of the birth of Jesus (5 B.C.)?
- If you reworked the problem considering there is no Year Zero in the Gregorian calendar, how much of a difference does it make in your final modern global population?

Now for the advanced questions...

- What is the implication of these calculations for the Biblical model?
- What are the implications of this model for the Biblical narrative?
- Can you propose a natural and 'supernatural' solution to the disparities? Generate numerical predictions from this solution.

I find it interesting that every creationist I've asked to work this problem has tried to evade it. Did they work it and not mention it out of some concern, or were they afraid to even work it? As of this writing (August 10, 2008), this problem is not on AIGs list of Arguments we think creationists should NOT use, but it should be added soon.